Businessman Wins in Spam Lawsuit

Businessman Wins in Spam Lawsuit

Techtree News Staff, Dec 28, 2005 1640 hrs IST

An internet marketing firm has been forced to pay £300 in damages for sending out unwanted e-mail adverts.

In what clearly spells "bad news" for spammers... an internet marketing firm has been forced to pay damages for sending out unwanted e-mail adverts.

Nigel Roberts (37), a Channel Islands-based businessman, received unwanted e-mail adverts for a contract car firm and a fax broadcasting business, and decided to take action against Media Logistics UK. The result - he won. This victory is being touted as the first victory of its kind for people who are tired of junk e-mails clogging their in-boxes day-after-day.

Three years ago the EU passed an anti-spam law, the Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications, which gave individuals the right to fight spam, enabling them to claim damages. Roberts said that under the new laws, anyone who is spammed has the right to seek damages from the perpetrators of the unwanted e-mails, faxes or text messages.

Accordingly Roberts wrote to Media Logistics UK, asking for an apology and claiming damages. He also asked the company to provide details of the data obtained on him, failing which he issued a claim against it.

Media Logistics UK acknowledged the claim, but did not defend it. Finally, a Colchester County judge ruled against the company, and in favor of Roberts. In an out-of-court settlement, Media Logistics UK agreed to pay Roberts damages of £270 plus his £30 claim-fee.

Roberts believes that since he launched his action in the small-claims court, he was restricted to receiving a "limited" amount in damages.

Roberts expressed the view that his might be a tiny victory, but spammers would now realize that people don't have to put up with unwanted junk in their e-mail in-boxes.

Media Logistics UK was unavailable for comment.

Spam, estimated to account for over 65 percent of global e-mail traffic, is becoming an increasingly irritating issue to tackle And events like these might just be the starting-point in a possibly long battle against spam.

Discuss this article
( All fields are mandatory )
Comment here
Name
City
E-mail
Word Verification
Type the characters you see in the picture below.
Characters are not case sensetive.



Discussion Board
DORA
,TAMPAFL, on Jan 15, 2006 06:11 AM
HEY GIRL
C Savill
,Brushford, on Dec 30, 2005 05:50 PM
Well done Mr Roberts, I for one would love to do what you did but we just sit and put up with it. (it still filters through even when blocked via BT etc.) Thank you.
CS Shyam Sundar
,Coimbatore, on Dec 28, 2005 06:08 PM
Pooh., for a mere 270 pounds., imagine this India., its klike 270 rupees., would any1 battle for spam just for 270 rupees., best idea., keep a seperate email address just for tehse spam.,
Adam
,Houston TX, on Dec 28, 2005 08:38 PM
Separate email addresses wil not work as spamming companies use robotic "harvesters" to locate email address across the internet and there is nothing you can do about it. Best idea, slap multi-billion US Dollar lawsuits on any company caught sending out unsolicited emails. That will stop them dead in their tracks.
jmanatee
,NPR, on Dec 29, 2005 04:49 AM
I agree the only way you are going to make spam go away is it punish those spamming. You have to hit them where is hurts. In the wallet
tyrik amadeedu
,palihnkaresh, on Dec 30, 2005 03:51 AM
In countries where mailing to government is free, mail all junk faxes to your MP or congressman. You can also forward all junk emails, even if the politico hasn't yet helped the poor Nigerians free up their money. Suggest you refrain from sending the penis enlargement spam, these folks already are macho enough.

Copyright(C) 2010 UNML. All rights reserved.