Firefoxing away to Version 3

Nikhil Rastogi, Jul 06, 2008 0909 hrs IST

The enhancements to the latest version though not revolutionary are certainly noteworthy.

Great upgrade, faster rendering and memory efficiency, excellent security, new address bar is a welcome and incredible extensible.

Firefox 3 no longer supports older OSes such as Windows 9x series; same with Mac OS X versions 10.2 and below

E-Mail Print

EXPERT REVIEW

Better bookmark management

One thing that I really didn't like is Firefox's bookmark manager. It was always clunky and didn't have a flair for assisting convenient navigation. In the new version, it has been much improved, adding a bookmark is so much simpler plus navigation through hordes of bookmarks has been upped a level or two; now you no longer have to right-click to rename a bookmark, simply select it and rename it in the detailed view that pops up.

Tagging (not to be confused with keywords) as most of you already know is a quick way to identify/locate information that you want. It serves as an added benefit to old-school categories while being much quicker to locate. In Firefox, tags have been added for the same effect - just add a tag and type the location bar (now called awesome bar), press enter regardless of what appears in the drop down and you'll be taken directly to the bookmarked link that you want to visit.

Adding a bookmark is simpler than ever, just click the star to quickly bookmark the website.

Doing so will automatically put the bookmark in the "Unsorted" category.

Removing the recently added bookmark couldn't be easier, click on the yellow star again, hit Remove Bookmark

Bulb idea.jpg- Place to the left of the text
Tip: If you'd like to know about keyword searches, mozillaZine has a great article on Using keyword searches.

USER COMMENTS

for me ie rocks :)

by Sumit, Bhubaneswar, on Dec 05, 2008 09:03 PM, Report abuse Reply

Nice !!

by Bart, Eat my Shorts !!, on Nov 10, 2008 05:50 PM, Report abuse Reply

need to download

by marcia adams, medway, on Jul 09, 2008 03:45 AM, Report abuse Reply

There is one downside I found about Fire Fox 3.0, that is there is no option to alphabetically sort your book marks like the previous versions.

by Ranabir Ghosh, Kolkata, on Jul 07, 2008 11:37 AM, Report abuse Reply

Overall a very good browser.. haven't even used IE for ages now. Nice review from the team

by Anubhav, Kolkata, on Jul 07, 2008 09:58 AM, Report abuse Reply

is best browser

by hamid, bardubai, on Jul 07, 2008 09:44 AM, Report abuse Reply

Well, since I have been never used Firefox before, I think I'll stick with Window Explore.. but is that memory usage take big paticipate upon my computer?

by FES, Miles City, on Jul 07, 2008 06:10 AM, Report abuse Reply

Are you sure the search in add-ons isn't a beta feature? I am using the final version. It just has the search in downloads window, not the add-ons window.

by Akshay, Delhi, on Jul 06, 2008 04:18 PM, Report abuse Reply

I think it's an extension that adds those search boxes and "sort by date" buttons. I've used the betas and it wasn't there either.

by Noam Nelke, Beer Sheva, Israel, on Jul 06, 2008 04:27 PM, Report abuse

I am also using the final version and it has de addon search box...

by John, delniaso, on Jul 07, 2008 05:05 AM, Report abuse

Problem of systematic crashing has not been addressed. I run an ALIENWARE 9750 with Vista 32 and Sp1. FF3 has crashed every day without fail. A cute dialog box pops up and tells me the obvious (Fire Fox has crashed!!!). The box asks what page I was on, than transmits the info to FF3 central.

by Dr. P2P, Tempe, on Jul 07, 2008 05:00 AM, Report abuse Reply

Whoever thought the memory usage would improve is a jackass. FF3 is using 111,315K of memory as i type this, with NO other tabs, or even background programs running. It's like the Vista of the browser world...

by Angad, Delhi, on Jul 07, 2008 03:05 AM, Report abuse Reply

Oh please... get over yourself. The memory consumption will obviously vary depending on what sites you view and the many variables associated with browsing. e.g. image quality, dynamic content, plugins, addons, blah blah. if you are seriously sweating 100 megs, you seriously need to chill and upgrade whatever POS you're using. If you can do better... build your own browser.

by Anonymous, So Cal, on Jul 07, 2008 04:34 AM, Report abuse

I have the following results which are apparently different from some of you. FF 3.0 with 7 open windows 68MB

by William, Atlanta, on Jul 07, 2008 03:39 AM, Report abuse Reply

I still don't know why people use IE........ Evry other browser is better than IE and of course FF3 is the best of the lot.

by Bhaskar, Bengaluru, on Jul 07, 2008 02:42 AM, Report abuse Reply

I'm certainly not seeing any improvements in memory usage with FF3. It quickly zooms to 100,000K on my Intel-based Dell 8300.

by Kate, Dallas, on Jul 06, 2008 03:40 PM, Report abuse Reply

I am disappointed too, pretty soon after opening Firefox memory usage is well over 100,00

by brian, Greenville, on Jul 06, 2008 06:15 PM, Report abuse

My firefox is running at over 200k, is there anything i can do to lower the memory usage?

by eddie, phoenix, on Jul 06, 2008 09:19 PM, Report abuse

Same thing here

by Zak, LA, on Jul 07, 2008 02:33 AM, Report abuse

ff3 is much slower in linux fedora 9 and ubuntu hardy but i think there working on the bugs

by michael, oxford , alabama, on Jul 07, 2008 12:20 AM, Report abuse Reply

firefox is great but most of extensions that were available with previous version are not available and there seems to some bugs to be ironed out.also new IE 8 is quite fast like firefox

by sachin, goa, on Jul 07, 2008 12:19 AM, Report abuse Reply

Wow! for a dummy like me, this review is very instructive. Now, if there is a FF3 manual out there, think I need to do serious reading.

by Mark, Apopka, on Jul 06, 2008 06:44 PM, Report abuse Reply

Firefox is great! Can't wait for V3 to be available to me.

by Giovannina, Reno, on Jul 06, 2008 10:55 AM, Report abuse Reply