Why-Fi?
Ameya Dalvi, Oct 01, 2008 1858 hrs IST
While I endorse securing home and private networks, I am totally against the suggestion of abolishing internet hotspots.
Ameya Dalvi, Oct 01, 2008 1858 hrs IST
While I endorse securing home and private networks, I am totally against the suggestion of abolishing internet hotspots.
After the unfortunate series of blasts in Delhi, Bangalore and a few other cities, a lot was made out of the terror mails that followed. On two occasions, the mail was sent using unsecured WiFi networks. Following these incidents, unsecured WiFi networks were made to look like a bundle of highly hazardous material left carelessly in the open, causing a potential threat to human lives and national security. My question is pretty simple - would it have changed anything for the better (with respect to the incidents) had all the networks been secured, and in wake of the gazillion IP masking techniques that prevail?
While I completely endorse the idea of securing home and private networks, I am totally against the suggestions of abolishing all internet hotspots or bringing a stay on "WiMAX"ing cities.
Yes, home users should ideally secure their wireless networks for reasons beyond terrorism. People give all kinds of excuses ranging from "I don't know how" to "I got nothing important on my PC" for not doing the same. But consider this scenario where you have subscribed to a "pay per MB" package and you haven't bothered securing your network. If you have smart neighbors, then this unintended social service may cost you dear. So five minutes worth of efforts may save you a lot of cost, and of course, headache.
more than a month and still waiting for your next editorial.
by Rahul_Jawale, Mumbai, on Nov 06, 2008 02:25 PM, Report abuse Reply
Hey we all want a free lunch don't we? While I do agree that home users must secure their routers, I am not sure that I agree about the hotspots. Let me ask a question here. Has the clamp down on Cyber cafes to ensure compliance about the identity of users been useful or not? I think it has. In fact, that is what has driven terrorists to seek out home routers to hack. How could they be policed if they start using the hotspots? Would someone enlighten me if my understanding is wrong?
by Emil, Mumbai, on Oct 30, 2008 03:44 PM, Report abuse Reply
the whole wireless being used to send email issue is somewhat overblown - after all it's not as if they used the wireless connection to activate the bomb but they merely sent the emails using the connection. however since it was unsecured they were able to access it anonymously and send the email without being identified.
by sandeep, chennai, on Oct 29, 2008 12:15 PM, Report abuse Reply
hi. what ppl need to know is the importance of protecting their pc and their connectiona. there should be some help provided by these so called WIFI and WIMAX service providers in the way that they could give users hardware firewalled routers. if this cannot be done then it is up to tech sites like Techtree and others to take the role and get the word out. as a mod on the forums, i would be glad to help any1 comming forth and asking anything abt configuring or managing a firewall which has intrusion prevention and is a 2 way firewall.
by Vishal_Kadakia, mumbai, on Oct 08, 2008 06:41 PM, Report abuse Reply
News > Internet , November 22, 2008 0830 hrs IST
Approach paper readied ...
News > Internet , November 22, 2008 0938 hrs IST
For all you movie and sports buff ...
News > Internet , November 21, 2008 1857 hrs IST
Surprisingly 76% spend on digital downloads ...
News > Gadgets , November 21, 2008 1831 hrs IST
Kingston new offing the -- DT150 USB drives ...
News > Internet , November 21, 2008 1748 hrs IST
A service giving search power to the user ...
Harish Chopra | Delhi
While I endorse securing home and private networks, I am totally against the suggestion of abolishing internet hotspots.
I want mobileoffice configuration
by Anand, Varanasi, on Nov 13, 2008 02:36 PM, Report abuse Reply