To HD or Not To HD

To HD or Not To HD

Kunal Rupera, Sep 01, 2007 1109 hrs IST

Is it time to go High Definition?

The progression from VHS to CD to DVD, and now to HD-DVD and Blu-ray media has coerced most consumers to consider a display upgrade. High-Definition (HD) has been thrust upon us, and it's time you gear up for this digital revolution in home entertainment. When buying an HD-based display (either an LCD or Plasma), for most people the choice boils down to "the largest that I can afford," or "the best that money can buy." So, the big question is, is bigger always better? Resolution is one of the most important factors for shifting to HDTV (HD television), which is why it is also the most misinterpreted, or misguided term that drives users into buying a product of a particular brand. In our quest for an HDTV, we forget the most crucial factor - application.

So, what is this resolution, and how does it affect us?

The resolution of a flat panel TV screen is the amount of vertical and horizontal dots or pixels (picture elements) that join together to create the display screen. More the number of picture elements, that much more data can be added to the image, thus giving you better image detail, color, contrast, etc. The viewing area of the screen can be increased as well, depending on the size of an individual pixel. With the increase in size, and a greater number of physical pixels in that size, videos will appear richer and smoother over longer distances as well.

If you've visited a television showroom lately, you would have noticed most televisions labeled "HD Ready." The fact that a product bears the label "HD-ready," does not necessarily mean that it can display the full picture resolution possible from an HD source. Most HD-ready sets do not have enough pixels to give true pixel-for-pixel representation without interpolation. For a television set to be truly high-definition, it has to support 1080p resolutions wiz. 1920 x 1080 pixels. Some of the TV sets that can do full HD are the Mosel Blaque series of Samsung, Plasmas from LG - like the 71py10, or the KLV-40X200A LCD TV from Sony.

In our race for buying an HDTV, we fail to notice a crucial aspect of television called application. If you buy a 1080p television, you also need the input source of that television to be capable of doing HD resolutions so that they can be displayed on the screen pixel-by-pixel for optimum clarity. According to most usage models, a television is either connected to your friendly cablewala or uses some form of satellite-based service like DTH, or Tata sky; it can also be used to connect external players to watch movies, or consoles to play games. Additional video input sources like a handycam can also be connected to preview that last family vacation you shot. If we analyze each of the above usage models carefully, then we can conclude that in order to play most of this content in full-screen mode, it has to be interpolated or upscaled up to 5 times the resolution, or even more in some cases that results in severe loss of quality when compared to even standard-definition televisions.

While HDTV is definitely the future of television, I feel it is yet not ready for mainstream use. If you are a budget conscious person like most Indians, wait till the prices fall and the availability of HD quality cable broadcasts, or movies that come in the HD-DVD or Bluray format which are still not available in India through any form of retail stores. For gamers, HDTV is a worthy buy only if you own a PS3 and play games like Gran Tourismo HD, Virtua Tennis 3, Ridge Racer 7, and NBA 2007 which can be played at 1080p resolutions. Most other games are 720p and the consoles like XBox 360 can do only 1080i natively.

While HD is the future of audio-visual home entertainment, in its current form, HD is not ready for mainstream use yet.



Discussion Board
(58) Comments
su30mki
,Delhi, on Nov 18, 2007 02:15 PM
what about LCD TVs which have aspect ratio of 4:3 (I have seen on DMRC delhi metro stations). Me thinks thats fair enough for the time being.
s. nayak
,new delhi, on Jun 03, 2008 11:51 AM
20 inches LCDs which are the least expensive compared to wide screen models have 4:3 aspect ratio. However, HD telecasts are mostly in 16:9 ratio. Wide format is also necessary to view wide format DVDs. So when HD telecast begins in India, you can see that two black bands appear on the top and bottom of the screen of a 20 inch LCD TV, as is common to see on CRT TVs telecasting a 70mm film. We sometimes miss some details of the picture at the sides on CRT TVs in India as the sets are not wide.
s. nayak
,new delhi, on Jun 03, 2008 11:35 AM
While Mr. Rupera has composed a commendably balanced article, I do'nt entirely agree with him. It would be incorrect to say that HD has been thrust upon us. Anybody who can compare HD with SD knows the difference. It looks like as if you are looking out of your window. Being in a progressive society we deserve to enjoy better things brought to us by technology. But the real problem is we are not able to catch up with technology. It becomes available to us by the time it becomes obsolate in advanced countries. Even China is better than us in this respect. Despite all the software power of our country, why HD transmission is yet to begin in this country. We would be fortunate if HD transmission is started by DD in 2010 to telecast the Commonwealth games. There is a strong rumour that some DTH providers are going for HD towards the latter part of the year. Another difficulty is affordability. When not every household in the country has a CRT TV set at present, how many can afford a flat panel TV like Plasma or LCD. Coming to HD resolutions, 1080p requires atleast a 40 inch screen to see it in its full glory. Are our living-rooms that large to accommodate it. Besides, for an ordinary viewer there is no perceptible change in resolution. If you want to see it yourself, download HD movie traiers fro Apple's website and watch them in both 720p and 1080p on Apple's Quicktime player and tell me the difference.
SidSiva
,Dubai, on Sep 03, 2007 12:27 PM
great! but i still have a few questions.. what is 720p and 1080i? Are they lower resolutions as compared to 1080p? I am still a little confused with all the jargon..also, how is BluRay Discs different from HD-DVD?
Spoorthy
,Bangalore, on Sep 04, 2007 09:13 AM
p stands for Progressive Scan and I for Interlacing. It is like ....whether you want to water your garden slowly, covering the whole garden (Progressively, which takes time) or within the time, first cover as much as you can and then again start watering the parts which were not covered earlier (Interlacing, and compromise with quality)This is standard anomoly. Here watering the Garden can be taken equivalent to painting the TV screen with image (for display). In Progressive scan , every line of the TV screen are painted 60 times per second. Where as in Interlacing technique, half of the lines of the TV screen are painted 60 times per second. Ex: The beam paints every odd-numbered line first as it moves down the screen. Next time the beam moves down the screen, it paints even-numbered lines. The entire screen in two passes is painted 30 times every second. Both can give better video output and the quality really depends on several other factors like, Data Rates for instance.
Sandeep
,Chennai, on Sep 20, 2007 06:58 PM
1080i is same resolution as 1080p but somewhat lower quality. 720p is a lower resolution than 1080i and 1080p. i guess u might say that 1080i is better than 720p although i'm not sure abt that. Blu-Ray can store upto 50 GB max. but only abt 5 hrs of HD video. HD-DVD can store upto 25-27 GB max but is able to store more video becos of some bla-bla-bla difference. hope that helps!!!
s. nayak
,new delhi, on Jun 03, 2008 10:57 AM
I agree with Mr Spoorthy from Bangalore. However, I want to make it clear that there is no perceptible change in quality by switching over to 1080p from 720p. It only requires a bigger screen and a lot of money. I have seen HD in both the resolutions and believe me it would take an expert to find any difference. If we compare progressive scan with interlaced scan, the picture is lot more stable with 'p'. Blu-ray discs store a lot more data than HD-DVD and as such can store more HD content and boasts of more features. Most importantly, Blu-ray promoted by SONY is going to be the next multimedia player format fasing out DVDs gradually. HD-DVD promoters have acceded defeat in the format war as most of the manufacturers have sided with SONY. Remember Betamax, which was promoted by SONY lost out to VHS in the past. This time SONY went all out to ensure victory for its format. The Blu-ray disc players however, would be backword compatible, i.e. can play DVDs but wo'nt play HD-DVDs.
Bart Simpson
,Springfield, on Apr 25, 2008 01:10 PM
the article is very neat :)
prakash kawle
,Bombay, India, on Apr 23, 2008 11:04 AM
Found the article quite instructive and interesting
HD isnt ready!
,Not HD, on Apr 21, 2008 06:19 AM
HD doesnt mean better quality Fast moving animations look lousy on both plasma and LCD TVs
Allan
,Mumbai, on Apr 21, 2008 09:55 AM
Dude, wtf are you talking about? HD obviously means better quality. But you need to have a HD input for that. Haven?t you noticed how crystal clear the demos look on the HD Tvs? That?s coz they are using a Hd source. You can?t expect the same quality with your sd cable signal? Hd makes sense only if you have a ps3 or plan on buying a hd player(till we get hd content over cable). If your size is below 42? get Hd ready else get Full HD.
PLAGARISM ALERT
,TECHTREE, on Nov 24, 2007 02:15 PM
Raunak Roy from CompareIndia has lifted many paragraphs from your column here sir. Here are some examples: You Wrote: For gamers, HDTV is a worthy buy only if you own a PS3 and play games like Gran Tourismo HD, Virtua Tennis 3, Ridge Racer 7, and NBA 2007 which can be played at 1080p resolutions. Most other games are 720p and the consoles like XBox 360 can do only 1080i natively. He Wrote: While HDTV buying translates to heavy dents in the pocket; avid gamers who own a PS3 and play 1080p capable games such as Gran Tourismo HD, Virtua Tennis 3, Ridge Racer 7 and NBA 2007, it is a worthy buy. You Wrote: If we analyze each of the above usage models carefully, then we can conclude that in order to play most of this content in full-screen mode, it has to be interpolated or upscaled up to 5 times the resolution, or even more in some cases that results in severe loss of quality when compared to even standard-definition televisions. He Wrote: If you were to play the content in full screen mode, which means upscaling the content to five times more than the resolution offered, it would result in severe loss of quality. What you need is high-def cables (HDMI or high-def media interface) and high-def set-top boxes that are still not available in India.
Akshay
,Mumbai, on Mar 16, 2008 10:27 AM
You are talking as if, it's exclusive info that Techtree has conveyed here that no one on planet earth knows... Sheesh !
bhargesh
,mumbai, on Feb 05, 2008 08:55 PM
thanks a lot ... very good analogy of a car and a very nice informative article... I am more aware of what HD Ready means
Kaushik Das
,New delhi, on Feb 24, 2008 02:14 AM
Did i miss something? Where was the car analogy?
sanjay
,mumbai, on Feb 10, 2008 02:25 AM
I am going for HD tv as I do not watch TV but its Great for Blu ray movies.
HellBoy
,PetersBERG, on Sep 07, 2007 04:33 PM
What could be the min. config of PC to play 1080p video with AAC audio? I need to play AVI files. Any guidance..
Sarbjeet
,amritsar, on Sep 15, 2007 09:24 PM
From what I know, Atleast a 3 GHz processor if you are NOT using an Intel C2D.
Sandheep
,Bangalore, on Jan 22, 2008 09:28 PM
You need a Video card that supports 1080p and a screen that supports it thats all.
Viswa
,Hyderabad, on Jan 30, 2008 04:43 PM
Browse through ATI or nVidia website and choose a HD graphics card that supports 1080p and plug it into yr PC. Most of these cards should support AAC.
Mayank Mathur
,BANGALORE, on Oct 18, 2007 08:48 AM
Hi, can anyone tell me which brand TV (LCD)will be a good option keeping the current industry in mind, and as the HD is still not a part of the mainstream, i am looking out for a option to go with my Philips home theatre which is HD ready
Sandheep
,Bangalore, on Jan 22, 2008 09:21 PM
Philips has a Full HD model with Pixel Plus functionality.. 37PFL7482/98 and 42PFL7422/98 the first is a 37 and the second is a 42" Model both priced below 90K. there are other Full HD models avalible whith smaller screen sizes and costs
V.Gupta
,Pune, on Nov 23, 2007 09:19 AM
Mr. Rupera's comments r very useful.I just happened to come across the review just before thinking of changing our old tv.
katalyst
,manchester, on Nov 19, 2007 04:49 PM
the xbox 360 elite is HD ready - 1080p.. The new avatar of the xbox 360 premium - also called xbox 360 premium 2 or pro 2 is HD enabled - 1080p.
SHANTANU SENGUP
,BOKARO STEEL CITY, on Nov 09, 2007 05:26 PM
YOUR ANALYIS IS AN EYE OPENER AND THE BEST I READ SO FAR. I 100% AGREE WITH UR VIEWS AS NORMAL BRAODCASTS APPEAR WORSE ON A HDTV THAN ON A STANDARD 29"
sunil
,varanasi, on Nov 07, 2007 07:23 PM
i m your member friend wallpaper
Praveen
,B'lore, on Nov 07, 2007 06:53 AM
I was reading an article in cnet. They mentioned some info that could be useful for us. They say full hd (aka 1080p) matters more for 40"+ LCD/plasma TV. For smaller screen you can not make out difference between 720p and 1080p. If you see most of the ppl in india, opt for 32', which is HD ready, 720p.
su30mki
,Delhi, on Nov 02, 2007 07:09 AM
hell yeah 29 inch regular TV's are all the way to go, i dunno why people are buying widescreen TVs, just to hang on a wall. Maybe they should find a better way to dispose their BLACK MONEY. Anyway i too was eager in buy a 32" LCD TV (sell off the xbox @ 20k, tv=30k), but i was nt sure that if Tata Sky gives HD format signal, now that the author has clarified. i'll stick to my good ol' TV.
Kunal
,Bangalore, on Oct 25, 2007 03:38 PM
Can anybody give me DVD players which can really do good upscaling? with the approx. price if possible...
sunil
,varanasi, on Oct 25, 2007 02:54 PM
i choice is 17 year old girl friend. music ,wallpaper
Rudraksh
,Ghaziabad (Indirapuram, near Banerjee's house), on Oct 23, 2007 12:02 PM
you know nothing. Xbox 360 has an update for 1080p.. So eat your words.
HD lover
,Bangalore, on Oct 10, 2007 01:42 PM
Hi, While your article is very sensible, you have not touched upon strong upscaling abilities of some dvd players, notably the oppo 981 or the philips DVP5982. Most AV receivers also offer upconverting. WHile i fully agree that not many formats in use in india are hd ready, dvd's certainly look better when properly upscaled.
Nupur
,Mumbai, on Oct 12, 2007 02:55 PM
Agreed. Interpolation techniques have come a long way. Would really like to know how good/bad they are and in what cases they are applicable and in what cases they are not. E.g can interpolation upgrade normal cable broadcasts to 1080p without significant noticeable loss in quality? Or is interpolation good enough to just convert 720p to 1080p so that loss in quality is not noticed. Good article btw.
Anonymous
,toronto, on Oct 11, 2007 12:50 AM
you should keep in mind that for any tv less than 40", the difference between 720p and 1080p can only be seen if you sit within 3 feet of the screen. Therefore, as per you logic which is not to go HD since most games only play at 720p is flawed to say the least. Furthermore, once you experience any game in HD i.e. 720p,1080i, 1080p or even watch any HD video, SD looks like crap. Just download a few HD trailers and compare that with the regular trailers available freely online.
Subhendu
,Calcutta, on Oct 12, 2007 02:52 PM
I disagree. While viewing distance is an important point that affects the "perceived" quality, your statement that nobody can figure out a the difference between a 720p and a 1080p video (for a TV that can DO native 1080p) from a distance of greater then 3 Feet is completely false. I would really like to know where you got that information from. A friend of mine works at the Sony showroom and I have been lucky enough to see their entire range with SONY test files and THERE IS perceptible difference in quality. There has to be else why would one want 1080p in the first place? Makes sense? So the theory does not look flawed. And i would really like to know the comments of others who actually own or have compared a 720p native TV set with a 1080p native set. To answer the second part, yes if u watch HD, SD does look like crap. and so the article clearly states that HD is the future (provided u have the right equipment).
Anonymous
,Brighton, on Sep 14, 2007 06:43 PM
The Xbox 360 can do 1080P with the latest firmware update. Both PS3 and Xbox 360 are capable of 1080P now.
Sarbjeet
,amritsar, on Sep 15, 2007 06:33 PM
Can anybody verify being able to run the XBOX 360 at 1080p resolutions? Heard that the XBOX 360 cannot do 1080p over HD Component cable and needs HDMI connectors. Only the XBOX 360 ELITE edition has a HDMI port and comes with a HDMI cable.
Ravi Shanker
,Coimbatore, on Oct 05, 2007 06:21 PM
The 360 can do 1080p over VGA and component.Only a few TVs support 1080p over component.For others,the signal will still be in 1080i but scaled to 1080p.Over VGA,its full 1080p Support
mahesh desai
,sangli (maharashtra), on Sep 30, 2007 03:45 PM
I NEED HD ANY INFOARMATION
Subhajit
,Kolkata, on Sep 22, 2007 07:58 PM
One thing you are forgetting is that there are upscaling DVD players from Sony and Philips available at reasonable price. These DVD Players can upscale normal DVD content up to 1080i resolution. The Quality definitely is much much better after upscaling and very near to true HD content. If you buy a HDTV now you can enjoy it using one of these DVD players until you get real HD hardware.
Sarbjeet
,amritsar, on Sep 24, 2007 09:40 PM
Have you ever tired watching ANY and I repeat ANY news channel on a high def TV? If upscaling without quality loss was possible then everyone would have a 1 MP photos upscaled to 100mega pixel images or video tape content upscaled to 1080p and ABOVE. While I agree that upscaliing is done by almost all manufacturors as they want to sell their product in the market, if you have ever watched a DVD on a upscaled version, I am sure 80% of the users here can figure out the difference.
Mohammad Zaher
,Dubai, on Sep 15, 2007 09:27 PM
I agree with Mr. Kunal. i think his point is to educate all about HD display. it's not only a label. it's the capability of a TV along with the source. so make sure you know exactly what you need before you buy it, or just wait till prices drop.
ranga
,hyd-bad, on Sep 09, 2007 06:11 AM
Thank u for the eye opening column, its better to buy an ordinary LCD TV at the moment and shift to HD LCD after 5 yrs when this picture tubes half life comes to naught and by the time HD will be a mainstream feature
pappa
,Bangalore, on Sep 06, 2007 06:48 PM
I've prob with my new ps2, I feel that the lens of the ps has some prob, it does not play most of the CDs, and have message saying there is no data or cannot read the CD, please let me know what I should do?
Amit
,Lautoka, Fiji, on Sep 04, 2007 01:39 AM
Thanks Kunal. This is a very important note for those intending to buy TV screens.
ud_dude
,delhi, on Sep 03, 2007 08:47 PM
How can you get a Canon EOS1D Mark II for EUR 270??....Stumped? Well according to a chinese website you can get this camera for the above mentioned price which is easily going at close to 7500$ at amazon. Hell you can even get a 2006 YAMAHA XV1700 ROADSTAR MIDNIGHT SILVERADO for 1100 EUR.....Yes you read that right! I say its a scam...the products featured at this website are probably fake!! What say you....find out for yourself....here's the web address eeashop
ud_dude
,delhi, on Sep 03, 2007 08:50 PM
www.eeashop.com
ud_dude
,delhi, on Sep 03, 2007 08:49 PM
Sony 60 KDSR60XBR1 for 367 EUR....now thats a tempting offer!! Could it be fake?
ud_dude
,delhi, on Sep 03, 2007 03:16 PM
How can you get a Canon EOS1D Mark II for EUR 270??....Stumped? Well according to a chinese website you can get this camera for the above mentioned price which is easily going at close to 7500$ at amazon. Hell you can even get a 2006 YAMAHA XV1700 ROADSTAR MIDNIGHT SILVERADO for 1100 EUR.....Yes you read that right! I say its a scam...the products featured at this website are probably fake!! What say you....find out for yourself....here's the web address http://eaashop.com/index.asp
pappu pass ho g
,zhumritallaya, on Sep 03, 2007 12:02 PM
good job
Punit Lodaya
,Mumbai, on Sep 03, 2007 04:31 AM
Wah! Wah! Change the picture yaar!! You look like a convict~
Pallav
,New Delhi, on Sep 02, 2007 06:32 PM
on the right track TT
Anonymous
,Kolkata, on Sep 02, 2007 06:06 PM
Yep, rightly said. Time to wait.
absar
,Mumbai, on Sep 01, 2007 10:42 PM
Simply superb,this article is short,sweet and very informative, this is the kind of article that readers can really benefit from,it will not only increases their knowledge but also help them make the right choice when they plan to switch over to HD,keep up the good work Kunal and the folks at techtree
Vishal_Kadakia
,mumbai, on Sep 01, 2007 01:28 PM
brilliant article after a long time. this one really made me post a comment after a very long time and i guess there should be more quality articles like these...
Andre Rodrigues
,Mumbai, on Sep 01, 2007 01:25 PM
he h heh, way to go Kunal, Your article is brilliant. But.. yeah your pic needs some work. Send it to me and ill photoshop a mucchi and daadi free
viral velani
,ahmedabad, on Sep 01, 2007 01:25 PM
will save a lot of money for the layman
Urvi Velani
,Ahmedabad, on Sep 01, 2007 01:24 PM
The article is quite informative, understandable and free from heavy jargon (which would not have been very helpful for a not-so-tech-savvy person like me!). Not planning to buy a HDTV as of now but the basic knowledge provided by this article would be very helpful in buying my next TV...:-)

Opinion Poll